From the Blog

Gender Dysphoria Foolishness

Cross-dressing Is A Sin for Men & Women

Deuteronomy 22:5 (KJV)
5  The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God. This passage supports Yahweh’s prohibition against same gender relationships in 

Leviticus 18:22-30
22  Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
23  Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.
24  Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you:
25  And the land is defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants.
26  Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations; neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger that sojourneth among you:
27  (For all these abominations have the men of the land done, which were before you, and the land is defiled;)
28  That the land spue not you out also, when ye defile it, as it spued out the nations that were before you.
29  For whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls that commit them shall be cut off from among their people.
30  Therefore shall ye keep mine ordinance, that ye commit not any one of these abominable customs, which were committed before you, and that ye defile not yourselves therein: I am the LORD your God.

Liberals,  celebrities and feminists get very angry when you tell them that Scripture forbids cross-dressing. For men in this generation, it would involve wearing dresses, make-up and high heels. For women, it is wearing slacks, bald fades and all other male attire.

Church people and  the “Nones” (none churchgoers) alike get very angry when they feel someone is trying to dictate what they can and cannot wear.

Deuteronomy 22:5 is a very clear directive given by Yahweh that has not changed with the so-called “modern” times. Women get highly offended when I say, I believe that wearing slacks, yoga pants and the like are in direct contradiction to this Scripture. Yet, they fail to see the correlation to attire to one’s gender identity association. What do I mean?

If what a person wears has no bearing on what gender they profess, why do transgendered and transexual persons want to wear clothing associated with the opposite sex? Because they know that clothing classifies what gender they “perceive” that they are mentally  and emotionally, not necessarily anatomically. But, according to Yahweh in Deuteronomy 22:5,  clothing does signify what sex a person is born with. He commands naturally born males and females to not exchange clothing garments. It causes confusion. It is a direct attack on His intention for them as their Creator. Why would He provide a body with male anatomy if He intended for the person to be a woman? Yahweh is not neurotic, but some people are.

Some even use the age old argument that at the time of Yahweh’s command there were no pants, therefore, if today’s  garment was designed for women, it’s a woman’s garment. Although they are correct in the fact that there were no pants at that time, the garments that each gender wore and how they were worn CLEARLY identified the wearer as male or female. They weren’t making bikinis when Yahweh’s edict was given either, but I can guarantee you, you’re not likely to see a heterosexual male going to the beach in one today! Why? Because most men don’t wear bras!!!!!!

When some homosexual men begin acting out their lifestyle, many adopt the attire of women and the use of make up to appear more feminine. Lesbians identifying as the “stud” in female to female relationships often shun dresses altogether, but begin wearing bald fades and donning clothing normally worn by men to appear more masculine. Why? Because the world normally associates dresses with women and pants with men. Unfortunately, satan has deceived these individuals.

The part I’ve never figured out about homosexuality and lesbianism is this:  If you say you are attracted to the same gender, and that heterosexuality is not for everyone, why then do you have one partner represent the husband/boyfriend or wife/girlfriend in your own relationships? Why not have two husbands or two wives? But no, in your own relationships, you have one partner play the role of the male and the other the female and then you assign functions to each other that represent husband/wife societal responsibilities like cooking, cleaning, financial provision, men having test tube babies, etc. Why go through the trouble of building a model on same sex relationships if you’re only going to follow the Lord’s original design?


It’s destroying the minds of our children.

When little boys and girls suffering from gender dysphoria (another word for sin) begin to play dress up in the opposite gender’s clothing or request their parents allow them to dress as the opposite gender in public, they know exactly what attire is associated with the respective genders: men wear pants; and women wear dresses. There is an entirely new movement amongst misguided parents and the educational system to allow children to choose which gender they want. There are even parents and physicians that allow children suffering from gender dysphoria to  receive hormone treatments to counteract their natural sexual development. And for some, many years later wanting to revert to their birth sex, it’s difficult at best, and many times not successful. It’s tragic!

In the end, we all know that a dress and heels worn by a man does not a woman make!

Therefore, Target should not allow men wearing dresses to use bathrooms designated for women and girls.

The Master’s Servant,




Share the joy

Have your say